Associations between structure- and process-orientated measures and stroke long term mortality - an observational study based on routine data.

OBJECTIVES: Various measures are used to improve the quality of stroke care. In Germany, these include concentrating treatment in specialized facilities (stroke units), mandatory quality comparisons of hospitals in some German states, and treatment according to prespecified structure and process specifications (neurological complex treatment 8-981 or 8-98b). These measures have previously only been analyzed individually and regarding short-term patient outcomes. This study analyzes these measures in combination, considering patients' comorbidities as well as stroke severity in a longitudinal perspective. MATERIALS/METHODS: Analyses were based on data from 243,415 insurees of Germany's biggest health insurance (AOK) admitted to hospitals between 2007 and 2017 with cerebral infarction. Mortality risk was calculated using Cox regressions adjusted for various covariates. Kaplan-Meier analyses were differentiated by treatment site (stroke unit/external quality assurance/ Federal State Consortium of Quality Assurance Hesse - LAGQH) were performed, followed by log-rank tests and p-value adjustment. Trend analyses were performed for treatment types in combination with treatment sites. RESULTS: All analyses showed significant advantages for patients who received Neurological Complex Treatment, especially when the treatment was performed under external quality assurance conditions and/or in stroke units. There was an increasing frequency of specialized stroke treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Quality-enhancing structures and processes are associated with a lower mortality risk after stroke. There appears to be evidence of a cascading benefit from the implementation of neurological complex treatment, external quality assurance, and ultimately, stroke units. Consecutively, care should be concentrated in hospitals that meet these specifications. However, since measures are often applied in combination, it remains unclear which specific measures are crucial for patient outcome.

[Specialization of Acute Stroke Care in Germany: Structural Changes During 2006-2017]. / Spezialisierung der Schlaganfallversorgung in Deutschland: Strukturveränderungen im Zeitraum von 2006­2017.

HINTERGRUND: Um die Schlaganfallversorgung zu optimieren, wurden in Deutschland in den letzten Jahren verschiedene qualitätsfördernde Maßnahmen (qfM) in regional unterschiedlichem Maß eingeführt. Ob sich diese Maßnahmen über die Jahre flächendeckend etabliert haben, ist unklar. METHODE: Für die strukturbezogenen Analysen der Schlaganfallversorgung in Deutschland wurden alle relevanten dokumentierten Schlaganfälle (ICD-10) aus den Qualitätsberichten (QB) deutscher Krankenhäuser und eine repräsentative Stichprobe von Krankenversicherungsdaten (AOK) im Zeitraum von 2006 (QB)/2007 (AOK) bis 2017 verwendet. Diese Informationen wurden u. a. durch Angaben zu zertifizierten Stroke Units der Deutschen Schlaganfall-Gesellschaft (DSG) und Daten zur Führung von regionalen Schlaganfall-Registern der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutschsprachiger Schlaganfall-Register (ADSR) ergänzt. Zur Verfolgung der Veränderungen des Versor-gungsgeschehens im deutschen Bundesgebiet wurden die Daten mit geografischen Daten (Bundesamt für Kartographie und Geodäsie) verknüpft. Es erfolgten univariate Analysen der Daten und eine Trend-Analyse der verschiedenen qfM im Jahresverlauf (Konkordanzkoeffizient nach Kendall). ERGEBNISSE: Die QB Analysen zeigten einen Anstieg kodierter Schlaganfälle in Krankenhäusern mit qfM um 14-20%. In 2006 wurden 80% der Schlaganfälle (QB) in einem Krankenhaus mit min. einer qfM kodiert, in 2017 95%. Diese Entwicklungen spiegelten sich auch in den AOK-Routinedaten wider, wobei in 2007 89% und in 2017 97% der Patient:innen unter mindestens einer qfM behandelt wurden. Dabei waren in 2007 bei 55% der behandelnden Krankenhäuser qfM vorhanden, in 2017 bei 72%. SCHLUSSFOLGERUNG: Patient:innen werden inzwischen signifikant häufiger in Krankenhäusern mit Spezialisierung auf die Schlaganfallversorgung behandelt. Auch die verschiedenen qfM haben sich im Laufe der Jahre im gesamten Bundesgebet verbreitet, jedoch existieren noch Versorgungslücken, die geschlossen werden sollten, damit in Zukunft alle Patient:innen qualitativ hochwertig behandelt werden können. BACKGROUND: In order to optimize stroke care, various quality-enhancing measures (qfM) have been introduced in Germany in recent years to varying degrees across regions, with the aim of achieving the best possible quality of care. It is unclear whether these measures have become established nationwide over the years. METHOD: For the structural analyses of stroke care in Germany, all relevant documented strokes (ICD-10) from the quality reports (QB) of German hospitals and a representative sample of health insurance data (AOK) for the period from 2006 (QB)/2007 (AOK) to 2017 were used. This information was supplemented by data on certified stroke units from the German Stroke Society (DSG) and data on the maintenance of regional stroke registries from the Working Group of German-Speaking Stroke Registers (ADSR), among others. To track changes in patterns of care in Germany, the data were linked with geographic data (Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy). Univariate analyses of the data and a trend analysis of the different qfM over the year (Kendall concordance coefficient) were performed. RESULTS: The analyses (QB) showed an increase in coded strokes in hospitals with qfM between 14-20%. In 2006, 80% of strokes (QB) were coded in hospitals with at least one qfM and 95% in 2017. Comparing years, AOK data showed similar trends: in 2007, 89% of patients were treated in hospitals with at least one qfM and 97% in 2017. In 2007, 55% of treating hospitals had qfM and 72% in 2017. CONCLUSION: Meanwhile, patients are more often treated in hospitals that specialise in stroke care. In addition, the various qfM have spread across the nation over the years, but there are still gaps in care that should be addressed to ensure quality care for all patients in the future.

Long-term outcomes of stroke unit care in older stroke patients: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: older patients are less frequently treated in stroke units (SUs). Clinicians do not seem convinced that older patients benefit from specialised treatment in SU similarly to younger patients. OBJECTIVE: our study aimed to compare older patients' long-term outcomes with and without SU treatment. METHODS: this study used routinely collected health data of 232,447 patients admitted to hospitals in Germany between 2007 and 2017 who were diagnosed with ischaemic stroke (ICD 10 I63). The sample included 29,885 patients aged ≥90 years. The outcomes analysed were 10-, 30- and 90-day, and 1-, 3- and 5-year mortality and the combinations of death or recurrence, inpatient treatment and increase in long-term care needs. Bivariate chi-square tests and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used, adjusting for the covariates age, sex, co-morbidity, long-term care needs before stroke and socioeconomic status of the patients' region of origin. RESULTS: between 2007 and 2017, 57.1% of patients aged <90 years and 49.6% of those aged ≥90 years were treated in a SU. The 1-year mortality rate of ≥90-year-olds was 56.9 and 61.9% with and without SU treatment, respectively. The multivariable-adjusted risk of death in ≥90-year-olds with SU treatment was odds ratio (OR) = 0.67 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.62-0.73) 10 days after the initial event and OR = 0.76 (95% CI = 0.71-0.82) 3 years after stroke. CONCLUSIONS: even very old patients with stroke benefit from SU treatment in the short and long term. Therefore, SU treatment should be the norm even in older patients.

Quality Assurance Measures and Mortality After Stroke.

BACKGROUND: Quality assurance for acute in-hospital care in Germany is based on compulsory comparisons between institutions, so-called external quality assurance (EQA). The effectiveness of EQA has not yet been adequately studied. The purpose of the QUASCH project, which is supported by the Innovation Fund of the Federal Joint Committee, is to investigate the association between EQA and health care outcomes, specifically with respect to stroke. METHODS: The analyses were based on data from 379 825 patients insured by the AOK health insurance fund who were acutely admitted to a hospital because of stroke over the period 2007-2017. Data on 47 659 patients were derived from EQA documentation in the state of Hesse, in which stroke EQA had already been introduced in 2003; data on the remaining 332 166 patients were from other federal states, where 117 734 of these patients had been treated under EQA conditions. The association of EQA with mortality over the period of observation was analyzed by multivariate Cox regression, with the following covariates: age, sex, comorbidities, time period of occurrence, nursing care level, type of stroke, socio-economic deprivation in the region of origin, and treatment in a stroke unit. RESULTS: Compared to treatment without EQA, mortality risk under EQA in the state of Hesse was significantly lower (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.93; 95% confidence interval: [0.92; 0.95]). The reduction in mortality risk with EQA was somewhat lower in the other federal states (HR: 0.96 [0.95; 0.97]). Treatment in a stroke unit was associated with a mortality risk that was lower still (HR: 0.86 [0.85; 0.87]). Mortality risk rose with age, comorbidities, and need for nursing care; it was lower in women and in persons whose stroke occurred in a later period. CONCLUSION: Quality assurance measures are associated with lower mortality risk after stroke. The concentration of care in specially qualified institutions is associated with stronger effects than EQA alone.